|
The Hairy Mussel, Trichomya hirsute (Lamrack, 1819)
|
|
Kelsie O'Leary 2015
|
|
|
Summary | |
Despite how common this species of
mussel is in Australian waters, and it’s prevenance in the history of
Australian fisheries, even back to early indigenous communities (Catterall
& Poiner, 1987), there is not much known about the biology of Trichomya hirsute. The biology of the mussel from the Mytilidae
family is discussed at length within this webpage, addressing topics including
ecology, the micro-communities that they create, life history, behaviour,
evolution, and conservation are discussed.
|
|
|
Physical Description | |
Trichomya hirsute, like all bivalves,
consists of two laterally compressed shells, also known as valves, held
together by a hinge (Hickman et. al,
2011). Externally, these valves are dark brown to almost black in colour (Boyd,
2011; Laseron, 1959) and is sculpted by a series of fine radial striations
(Boyd, 2011). As the name suggests, the shell is covered in a large number of
hair like structures that are outgrowths of the periostracum (Boyd, 2011;
Laseron, 1959), which is the outer organic layer of the bivalve shell primarily
used for protection from boring animals (Hickman et. al, 2011). These hairs are especially common on the lower
section of the shell (NSW Department of Primary Industries, n.d.). As sessile,
colonial animals, they make use of these hairs for attachment to both each
other and the substrate. There is great variation among the shape of the animal
due to overcrowding of colonies (Laseron, 1959), and they can be up to 6 cm
across its body (NSW Department of Primary Industries, n.d., Boyd, 2011).
|
|
Figure 1 |
|
|
Figure 2 |
|
|
|
Ecology |
Habitat | |
The hairy mussel is a common in marine habitats on the
east coast of Australia. The animal lives within sessile communities in clumps
attached to rocks, reefs, or other artificial structures (Boyd, 2011; Laseron,
1956; Robinson & Gibbs, 1982) in inter- and sub-tidal areas (NSW
Department of Primary Industries, n.d.). Trichomya
hirsute prefers entirely marine habitats, but they can persist in low
salinity environments (Jenkins, 1976). The mussel can live to a depth of
15 m.
|
|
Figure 3 |
|
|
Figure 4 |
|
|
|
Micro-habitats | |
Within the colonial clumps of Trichomya hirsute lives a myriad of other marine invertebrate species.
To really analyse what type of community these clumps create and what types of
animals can be found within this micro-community, three separate mussel clumps
(as seen in figure 5) of varying sizes were broken up and examined under the
microscope. The following subheadings refer to these findings in order of
abundance from most abundant to least abundant.
Limitations of this experiment were
that the animals that were catalogued tended to be easier to spot and easier to
catch. It’s recommended that further, more thorough research be conducted in
this area really catalogue the amazing and great diversity seen in the
micro-communities that T. hirsute creates.
|
|
Figure 5 |
|
|
|
Sedentary Polychaetes | |
Generally, similar species were found within the three
clumps. The most common find were sedentary polychaetes, with great variety in
sizes. Most of the time, the animal was not seen, but the calcareous tube was
present. Several of these were found on each individual mussel. Examples of these can be seen in the images
below.
|
|
Figure 6 |
|
|
Figure 7 |
|
|
Figure 8 |
|
|
|
Bivalves | |
The next most group of animals was probably the bivalves,
with several different types present on all clumps. Some were beginning to
create a clump of their own, like the oysters; others were attached to the
hairy mussel’s shell, and were living with the spaces between the mussels, like
clams. Examples can be seen in the images below.
|
|
Figure 9 |
|
|
Figure 10 |
|
|
Figure 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sipunculans | |
Another common find were Sipunculans,
with several being found within each clump, with one clump containing 21
individuals. These animals tended to live in the tight space between two
mussels, often near the attachment site. Below is a video of two individuals
collected from one of the clumps.
|
|
|
|
Ascidians | |
Occasionally, solitary ascidians were
present on the outside of mussel shells or on the inside of vacated shells.
Several different types were found and can be seen in the images below.
|
|
Figure 37 |
|
|
Figure 38 |
|
|
Figure 39 |
|
|
|
Porifera | |
Growing on the outside on a few
mussels was a spongy mass, usually yellow in colour, was found. While exactly
what it was could not be determined, it was assumed that it was some type of
sponge. An image of this organism can be seen below.
|
|
Figure 40 |
|
|
|
Wildcards | |
There were also some animals found
that were only seen once or very rarely. This may be because they don’t usually
occupy this niche, or they were difficult to find or see. One such animal was a
single tiny brittle star. These echinoderms are known predators of the hairy
mussel, so it’s likely that there were more that were difficult to find. Also,
a single small sea cucumber was found, but a photo was not taken. Also
occasionally living on the shell were small ectoprocts, it was also likely that
these are more common than recorded, because these were quite small and
sometimes difficult to differentiate from hairs on the mussel, at least at a
quick glance.
These species can be seen in images
below.
|
|
Figure 41 |
|
|
Figure 42 |
|
|
|
|
Life History and Behaviour |
Reproduction | |
Consistent with the majority of bivalves, Trichomya hirsute is a sexually
reproducing gonochoristic bivalve with fertilisation occurring via broadcast
spawning (Goggin, 1994; Hickman et
al., 2011). From
the limited research conducted, it seems that the hairy mussel, at least in Lake
Macquarie, spawns year round, with three peaks in reproductive activity in
early winter, early summer, and early autumn (Goggin, 1994). In other Australian
mollusc species, it seems that reproduction in temperature dependant, with
molluscs usually spawning in cooler months, with the southern ranges on the
species typically having longer periods due to the reduced temperature (Wilson
& Hodgkin, 1967).
From this, it is hypothesised that it’s possible that T. hirsute populations in northern Australia, around Townsville,
may have more seasonal spawning than their southern counterparts, but more
research is required on this subject before we can be sure (Goggin, 1994).
|
|
|
Life Cycle | |
Not much is known about the life cycle of Trichomya hirsute, so the following
information will discuss the life cycle of animals in the family Mytilidae.
It’s important to keep in mind that this may or may illustrate T. hirsute life cycle, it’s simply the most educated assumption
we can make with the given information. Clearly, more research needs to be
conducted in this area on T. hirsute, specifically.
Like in the majority of molluscs, once the egg is fertilised,
the embryo will undergo spiral cleavage eventually resulting in the emergence
of a trophophore larvae. This stage is followed by the uniquely molluscian
stage of veliger, where the foot, shell, and mantel begin to develop (Hickman,
2011). In the family
Mitilidae, once the larvae grows to between 208 and 350 μm, the animal will
settle on the preferred substrate (Semenikhina et al., 2008) and develop into the adult form. A figure illustrating the basic
bivalve life cycle can be seen in figure 43.
|
|
Figure 43 |
|
|
|
Predators and Defence | |
While the predators of Trichomya hirsute have not been studied or recorded, it’s likely that
their predators are similar to those of other bivalve molluscs in the area. The
most important of which include predatory gastropods, starfish, crabs, and
shore birds (Bedman, et al., 2003).
To combat this, mussels in the Mytilidae family have developed several
defences. One of the most obvious is the hard, outer, bivalve shell that
protects the animal; however, most predators have developed ways to either open
or crack the shell. This has led to the development of harder and thicker
shells, especially in areas with an elevated level of predation. Other examples
of defence mechanisms include stronger adductor muscles to make it more
difficult to open the shell, the use of byssus to create stronger attachment to
the substrate (Bedman, et al., 2003).
|
|
|
|
Anatomy and Physiology |
Mantel and Body | |
See physical description for a
description of the shell and external anatomy of Trichomya
hirsute.
The shell is held together via the hinge ligament, and held closed through the
aid of the abductor muscles (figure 44) (Harris, 1990), and within the shell
the mantel and visceral mass of the animal is held (Hickman et. al, 2011). Thinly lining the
internal walls of the shell is the mantel, which contains blood vessels and
nerves, and has the job of secreting the shell and the hinge ligament. The
mantel is ciliated and is able to carry waste covered in mucus out of the shell
(Harris, 1990). Within the mantel cavity the gills are found, along with labial
palps which aid in feeding, and the modified foot with byssus fibres, which aid
in attachment. The main body of the animal contains the gut, glands, heart,
kidneys, and likely the gonads (Harris, 1990). Figure 44 shows a cross section
of Mytilus edulis planulatus, a
species from the same order as T. hirsute
(Harris, 1990).
|
|
Figure 44 |
|
|
|
Respiration and Digestion | |
In Trichomya
hirsute,
and the majority of molluscs, gas
exchange occurs through the mantel, but primarily via the gills. Gas exchange
via the gills occurs when specialised cilia on either side of the gill
filaments create a current, causing water carrying oxygen and nutrients to pump
past the filaments and to diffuse across the cells. The filtered water is then
pumped out the cavity via the exhalent siphon. Therefore, gills perform two
important jobs in filter feeding animals, such as T. hirsute – gas exchange, and feeding (Harris, 1990).
Feeding occurs when cilia around the gills collects
food and moves it to the mouth. There is much debate about how this happens
specifically, with the view that they are mucociliary feeders being held by
many, but this creates problems when thinking about how particles are sorted
according to size (Harris, 1990). More research needs to be conducted in this
area to understand how mussels feed.
Mussels, such as T.
hirsute, are able to control the speed of the water through the mantel, the
rate of extraction, and the rate of ingestion of food via the size of the shell
opening, rate of cilia beating, and muscular movements of the gill filaments
and the velum (Harris, 1990).
|
|
Figure 45 |
|
|
|
Circulation | |
Like the majority of molluscs, Trichomya hirsute, has an open circulatory system (Jones, 1983) with a
three chambered heart consisting of a ventricle and two atria that beats very
slowly (Hickman et. al, 2011). Some
of the blood is oxygenated in the mantel, returning to the heart; the other
part circulating though the sinuses to the kidneys, onto the gills to become
oxygenated and then back to the heart (Hickman et. al, 2011).
|
|
|
Excretory System | |
As is the case for all animals,
mussels create waste products, mainly in the form of varying concentrations of
ammonia and amino acids that they must excrete. Excretory organs in mussels,
including Trichomya hirsute, are the kidneys and pericardial glands (Harris,
1990)
|
|
|
Nervous System | |
While not much is known about
nervous systems in mussels, generally bivalves have a fairly limited nervous
system. Specifically, they have three pairs of ganglia connected via a system
of nerves and commissures. Along with this, they have a few underdeveloped
sense organs including statocysts in the foot, a couple of osphradia
(olfactory) in the mantel, and tactile cells (Hickman et. al,
2011). More research is needed to determine what sense organs Trichomya hirsute may possess.
|
|
|
|
Evolution and Systematics |
Phylogeny and Evolution of Class Bivalvia | |
It’s extremely difficult to
determine where a phylum, let alone a species, sits in the phylogenetic tree of
the animal kingdom, due to convergent and lost traits, and more recently the
introduction of molecular data. For this reason, the discussion of the
evolution of this animal will occur at the class level.
Molluscs first arose in the early
Cambrian, with bivalves evolving not long after (shown in figure 46) (Miller
& Sepkoski, 1988). The most recent ancestor of bivalves is believed to be a
now extinct class of molluscs called monoplacophora that possessed a single
laterally compressed shell (Hutchins et al., 2007). From here, they then radiated
steadily from there, thriving despite several mass extinction events, and
exploding during the Mesozoic period (Miller & Sepkoski, 1988). This
information can be inferred fur to the extremely comprehensive fossil record
present for bivalves (Hutchins et al., 2007).
|
|
Figure 46 |
|
|
|
Phylogeny of Species | |
·
Kingdom:
Animalia
o
Phylum:
Mollusca
§
Class:
Bivalvia
·
Subclass: Pteriomorphia
o
Order:
Mytiloida
§
Family:
Mytilidae
·
Genus:
Trichomya
o
Species:
T. hirsute
·
Common name: Hairy Mussel
·
Synonyms
o
Mytilus
hirsutus
o
Trichomya
hirsutus
|
|
Figure 47 |
|
|
|
|
Biogeographic Distribution |
Distribution | |
The hairy mussel is common
throughout the east coast of Australia, from Townsville to Tuross, through
South Australia and the Great Australian Bight (Iredale, 1939; Cotton 1961;
Middelfart et al., 2010), and
northern Tasmania (Middelfart et al.,
2010). Sightings for the bivalve have been recorded in map shown in figure 48. An
interactive map can be found here.
|
|
Figure 48 |
|
|
|
Population Dynamics | |
Because there hasn’t been much
research into the population dynamics of Trichomya hirsute, it’s hard to determine
what the future of the populations will be. One study on the population
dynamics of marine organisms on the Curtis coast, however, suggests that the
hairy mussel is increasing in abundance (Ulm, 2006). More research needs to be
conducted in this area to determine the current and potential future abundance
of this animal.
|
|
|
|
Conservation and Threats |
Human Exploitation | |
The hairy mussel has been exploited
by humans for centuries, going back all the way to pre-western aboriginal
societies, as they are a one of the dominant species in the Morton Bay area (Ulm,
2000). Studies suggest that traditional Aboriginal harvesting practices are
conducted in a way that will be sustainable for the species (Catterall &
Poiner, 1987).
|
|
|
Pollution | |
Our oceans and other bodies of
water are becoming more and more polluted with heavy metals, and this is having
varying effects on a wide range of marine and freshwater organisms. In general,
bivalves are known to be able to endure a wide array of different salinities,
temperatures, suspended sediments, and dissolved oxygen levels (Anderson,
2001). Due to the fact that Trichomya hirsute is a filter feeding animal,
it is directly exposed to the levels of heavy metals in its environment as they
are taken into the animal directly via the gills and bioaccumulate them to
levels above what is available in the water (Lopez et al., 2014). While the effects of these heavy metals to the biology
of this species has not been quantified, in freshwater mussels, exposure to
heavy metals has been known to alter growth, filtration efficiency, enzyme
activity, behaviour, and can cause death to the animal (Naimo, 1995). However,
it has been found that some bivalves are able to detoxify and store metals for
some time without dying (Lopez et al.,
2014).
There has been much research
surrounding the use of mussels, and T. hirsute
specifically, as bio-indicators in the presence and increase in the levels of
heavy metals in marine environments where they are present (Lopez et al., 2014; Klumpp & Burdon-Jones, 1982). This is due
to the fact that, as mentioned previously, filter feeding mussels take in and
are able to store heavy metals from the environment. This can give an
indication about the type of pollutants and long the environment has been
polluted for. It’s been found that T. hirsute is the
most effective bioindicator for heavy metal, excluding zinc, and could be used
to effectively monitor pollution (Lopez et al., 2014;
Klumpp & Burdon-Jones, 1982).
|
|
|
|
References | |
- Atlas of Living Australia.
Distribution Map [image] (n.d.) Retrieved from http://bie.ala.org.au/species/Trichomya+hirsuta#
- Bedman, H. A., Caldow, R. W.
G., Kaiser, M. J., Willows, R. I. (2003). How to toughen up your mussels:
using mussel shell morphological plasticity to reduce predation losses. Marine Biology, 487-494
- Bieler, R., & Mikkelsen, P. M.
[image] (2006). Bivalvia – a look at the branches. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 148, 223-235
- Boyd, S. (2011).
Hairy Mussle, Trichomya hirsuta. Retrieved from http://portphillipmarinelife.net.au/species/5653
- Catterall, C. P.,
& Poiner, I. R. (1987). The potential impact of hnman gathering on
shellfish populations,
with reference to some NE Australian intertidal flats. Oikos, 50 (1), 114-112
- Harris, V. A. (1990). Mussels
and oysters (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Sessile
Animals of the Sea Shore, (pp. 85-111). Melbourne, VIC:
Chapman and Hall.
- Goggin, C. L.
(1994). Gonadal development of the hairy mussel, Trichomya hirsute (Mollusca: Bivalvia) from Lake Macquarie, New
South Wales. Molluscan Research, 15(1), 21-28.
- Hickman, C. P.,
Roberts, L. S., Keen, S., Eisernhour, D. J., Larson, A., & I’Anson, H.
(2011). Molluscs. Integrated Principals of Zoology (pp. 352-358). New York, NY:
McGraw-Hill Companies
- Hutchins, M. (2007).
Bivalvia (Bivalves).Grzimek's Animal Life Encyclopedia (pp. 452). Farmington Hills,
MI: Gale
- Jenkins, B. W.
(1976). The distribution of several intertidal mollusc species in relation to
Sydney Harbour. Malacological Review , 138
- Jones, H. D.
(1983). The Circulatory Systems of Gastropods and Bivalves. In A. S. M.
Saleuddin & K.M.
Wilbur (Eds) The Mollusca: Physiology,
Part 2 (pp. 192). New York, NY: Academic Press
- Klumpp, D. W., & Burdon-Jones, C. (1982). Investigations
of the potential of bivalve molluscs as indicators of heavy metal
levels in tropical marine waters. Australian
Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 33(2),
285-300
- Laseron, C. F.
(1959). A Taxonomic Review of the Family Mytilidae from the Peronian Zoogeographical Province. In G. Whitley (Ed.), The
Australian Zoologist (pp. 267). Sydney, Australia:
E. J. Miller & Co. Retrieved from http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/38913190#page/319/mode/1up
- Lopez, L. K., Couture, P., Maher, W.
A., Krikowa, F., Jolley, D. F., & Davis, A. R. (2014). Response of the hairy mussel Trichomya hirsuta to sediment-metal contamination in the presence of a bioturbator. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 88, 180-187.
- Middelfart, P. U., Ponder, W. F,
& Beechey, D. (2010). Species
Trichomya hirsute (Lamarck 1819). Retrieved from http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/online-resources/fauna/afd/taxa/Trichomya%20hirsuta
- Miller, A. I., Sepkoski, J. J. (1988).
Modeling bivalve diversification: the effect of interaction on a macroevolutionary
system. Paleobiology, 14(4), 364-369.
- Naimo, T. J. (1995). A
review of the effects of heavy metals on freshwater mussels. Ecotoxicology, 4(6), 341-362
- NSW Department of Primary Industries.
(n.d.). Asian date mussel or bag mussel. Retrieved from http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/fisheries/pests-diseases/marine-pests/australia/asian-date-mussel-or-bag-mussel
- SIMS Foundation. Sydney Harbor Mussel
Community [Image] (n.d.). Retrieved from http://sims.org.au/research/current-projects/current-and-future-threats-to-the-biodiversity-of-sydney-harbour/
- SIMS Foundation. Close up mussle
clump [image] (n.d.) Retrieved from http://sims.org.au/research/current-projects/current-and-future-threats-to-the-biodiversity-of-sydney-harbour/
- Ulm, S. (2000).
Evidence for early focussed marine resource exploitation from an open coastal
site in
central Queensland. Australian
Archeology, 51, 66-67.
- Ulm, S. (2006). Seven Mile Creek
Mound. In S. O’Connor (Ed.), Coastal
Themes: An Archaeology of the Southern Curtis Coast, Queensland
(pp. 79-96). Canberra, ACT: ANU E Press
- Wilson, B. R., & Hodgkin, E. P. (1967).
A comparative account of the reproductive cycles of five species of marine
mussels (Bilvalvia: Mytilidae) in the vicinity of Fremantle, Western Australia.
Australian Journal of Marine and
Freshwater Research, 18, 175-203.
- Yochelson, E.L. [image] (1978). An
alternative approach to the interpretation of the phylogeny of ancient mollusks. Malacologica, 17(2), 165-191
|
|
|
|
|